Poker Schema? Are You One of Them?

Just about every poker player has in their mind a poker schema. A schema is only the way you think things work. When you find yourself in a hand up against a decision, or when you are trying to realize why a play went right or wrong, you seek advice from the network of logic and intuitions you have about how poker functions. Perhaps they’re about why check raising certain boards isn’t good, about what hands are too weak to value bet, and so on-all that, however a great deal more than that. Your schema includes all the notions you have concerning poker, how matches evolve, what it appears to be to lose or win, what variance feels as though. It includes all of the language and ideas you use to describe and analyze poker.

Yet this schema is not static. Whenever you learn new stuff about the game, your schema is altered slightly. Sometimes it’s added to, sometimes it’s tweaked in a certain spot. Not to mention, your schema is not always changed correctly. You might be taught a lesson where there is none, or where there is a lesson, you could possibly learn the wrong one. Your schema is consistently changing and shifting, adding and fixing errors. That is inevitable in a game that consists of random and imperfect feedback. There is a disorder that underlies your schema too.

So is poker a chess match? Perfectly, you are not completely wrong to imagine poker that way. Under all the chaos, poker is a chess match. It is logical and obeys fixed mathematical principles. But we do not have access to that. Unfortunately we cannot know the chess match, and we most likely never will. The only thing we have accessibility to is how we experience poker, and that is always mediated through our evolving schema. For people like us, the schema is poker.

There’s an old story from India that serves well here. It was said that there was a king who bought an elephant, a rare and exotic animal, from a distant land. He called five blind men who’d never heard about an elephant, and he asked each and every man to go into detail the creature to him. The first man squashed the tail, and said, “An elephant is like a rope.” The second man grabbed his arms around its leg and said, “An elephant is sort of a pillar.” The third man grabbed the trunk and said, “An elephant is like a tree branch,” etc, each man picking out his description from his limited perspective.

This is the way schemas work. Our limited experiences and perceptions congeal into a psychological model of the subject. Obviously, an elephant is not one of the things the men described, and it is more than the sum of all their beliefs.

In this manner, we are blind men groping at the limbs of poker. We graze against it over and over, even over tens of thousands of hands, but our schema is all we can label of it. It’s the only access we’ll ever have. The utter truth is inaccessible to us; all we all know is what presents itself, what we have had the luck of managing our fingers over, and the photo that we’ve stitched together from our experiences.

What i’m saying more concretely is this-every time you try to come up with a match, or try to analyze a situation, you will be wrong. You could possibly win, make the correct adjustment, even the right read, but you’ll still be slightly wrong. Wrong concerning what-that will depend-but the fact will remain that reality will be shaped in a different way from your schema. It is often and always will be. Ever since the day you started playing poker, you had a number of schema of how the game worked, and every day you’ve played poker, without unsuccessful, your schema has changed. And it’ll change again. This is true even for the best players in the world.

As being a poker player, you doubtless want to think of yourself as a student of logic and mathematics. You imagine rationality is the mortar with which you build your castle of poker. You may be correct that poker is controlled by mathematics and logic. But you yourself are not. Poker is played by human beings. It is experienced and learned by human beings. Humans are not rational machines. The functions of their brains are not a chess match.

And yet, that does not mean that mathematics and logic will get you nowhere, and I don’t mean to point out that you abandon them!

Develop your castle. You have to, even if the only materials you’ve are the sand and mud beneath you. That’s the path you’ve chosen, after all. Go on developing your poker game. But be aware that your castle must collapse repeatedly. Know that your strongest and most steadfast reasoning will sooner or later fall. It is your fate; at best, you are a creature that only approximates rationality, and that’s as far as your head can go. But so it is; the building must carry on.

Do you agree with it? Do you wish to be a poker player? This is your path, the only one. You will end up wrong, always wrong. Nevertheless, you must keep being wrong and keep whittling away at that wrongness.

What is Poker? Would You Consider Poker like a Chess Game?

You could claim that poker is a card game, played between multiple players, including cards and chips and positions etc. But we are able to delve deeper than that. How do you describe the subjective structure of poker? For instance, say you had to describe poker to a Martian. You’d need to explain this card game to someone that doesn’t know what cards are, or that of a table is-and after all, those activities are only symbols.

poker girl

A naïve perception of poker is going to be fixated at first glance of the game: the numbers on the cards, the suits, the felt table, the round chips. But those activities are incidental to poker. A game can be the same as poker that uses pebbles, or perhaps markings written down on paper, provided that it has sufficient rules. What’s important isn’t the cards. We wish to explore the relationships beneath the cards.

Poker players tend to be fond of describing poker almost like it were like chess. There are some more common metaphors, such as a gunfight or possibly a battleground, but I’ve found a chess match is the most popular.

What does it mean to consider poker as a chess match?

Describing poker like this suggests that poker is mechanistic. It shows that despite all the apparent randomness and luck involved, deep down it behaves deterministically-a game of real skill.

To consider randomness out of poker is to consider the mysticism out of it. Poker is often assumed is the game of gamblers, risk-takers, the steel-hearted and intuitively-minded. However when we call poker a chess match, we turn those logic around. Rather, poker is supposed to be analyzed, theorized about, dissected into its tiniest possible chunks then reassembled like a machine. It will become the domain of rationalists, mathematicians, and also cold strategists.

Poker players are trained to think this way. EV is the lens whereby they’re meant to see the world. They’re taught in which everything can be optimized, exploited, and divided into frequencies. It’s reassuring to think that, isn’t it? That underneath all the chaos, the whizzing cards and splashing chips, under each of the downswings and bad beats, the tilt as well as the frustrations, that all the way down inside the boiling heart of the thing, there is an equation or two that describes it all. Isn’t that the idea?

That in case you had but the time and mathematical power, you could fire up some equation or execute some algorithm that may “solve” it all for you? Needless to say, it’s well known that there are ways in which poker can be explained by math. But let’s think deeply concerning this. Why is this the way we are inclined to determine poker at the deepest level? Do you actually believe that’s how things work? Is learning poker the unveiling of a pristine, logical machine? Is poker a chess match?

You’ll believe that, distilled to its essence, poker is simply a mathematical system. You wouldn’t be alone in believing this way. Nearly all serious students of poker have learned to believe this, although not one of these has probably been told this outright. It is a type of ideas that is embedded in how we discuss poker; it is unconsciously absorbed, just like an element in the air. You might not know how or by which, but somehow it’s identified its way into your mind, and yes it makes perfect sense. Poker is a distinct system. A chess match. A collection of equations and matrices acting themselves out, again and again again.

The Moment You Landed On This Page. What is Poker to You?

poker

You’re reading landing this website simply because you want to improve your skill on poker game.

I’m sure much too well how that goes. When I began poker, I had been constantly in search of the tricks the advantages were using to win, convinced they had to be stashed somewhere. I ripped through books like this one, hoping to uncover clever ways to play draws, tricky bluffs that nobody knew about, as well as secret to handling aggressive players or 3-bet pots. Deep-down, I hoped that some hand, theory, or concept would suddenly light up everything I couldn’t see.
However that moment of revelation never came. Along with time and experience, I discovered that this wasn’t for deficiency of trying. If there is a secret in poker, it is primarily the: the way is as hard, rigorous, and disenchanting since the way has ever been.

I’ve met and taught countless poker players during my time as a professional, and I have not met one whose game was transformed to a high level merely by reading a book. That’s just not the way in which poker works. You can look for books claiming to teach you things like this, but I suspect that, we have spent through them, you will find yourself right where you began.
The goal of this website, then, is not to help you better at poker. Instead, it is to help you a better poker player.
Exactly what do I’m talking about?

Someone once told me, “Nobody teaches us how you can be poker players.” We have been taught strategy, how to read hands, the way to size bets, but being a poker player requires in addition to that. Poker is undoubtedly an isolating and confusing profession. The minute you sit down at a poker table, you’re submerged in a profoundly backward and contrary culture.

I asked myself one fundamental question as i decided to write this website: if I could go back eight years, to when I was just beginning my exploration into poker, precisely what would I tell my 16-year-old self? What have I learned that he must know? What are the most valuable ideas that might equip him for the long and frustrating journey ahead? If you wish to better understand what {it indicates|it implies} to be a poker player, this website is for you.

You may not be prepared to absorb all of the ideas and points of views presented here. That’s okay. I wasn’t possibly the first time I heard them, and

I heard them often times from many different people before these folks were ingrained in me. Chances are it will need someone else, maybe a couple of years down the road, perhaps a friend, a mentor, a stranger indicating a similar thing before it convinces you. And who knows-some of those ideas could be wrong for you. That’s okay. It’s part of the process. But let this website be a part of your journey, and even if it doesn’t change your beliefs or your perspective on the world or on poker, trust that it’ll help, regardless of whether you agree with it. Trust that it has a place in your process.

I would like to remind you that the life as a poker player is a journey. Treating it as something less is a disservice to yourself. All that I write, I write since I want you to thrive and grow out of this journey.

Having said that, you don’t need to be a professional to understand the valuables in this website. It is written to be useful to all ranges of players, from high-stakes professionals to people just interested in learning the game.

What’s poker to you personally? Is it an interest? A hobby? A passion? Would it be your calling? Consider this. This is where it all begins.